MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588170291 · doi:10.1002/mp.12160

Thoracic <scp>CT</scp>‐<scp>MRI</scp> coregistration for regional pulmonary structure–function measurements of obstructive lung disease

2017· article· en· W2588170291 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Fumin Guo, Sarah Svenningsen, Miranda Kirby, Dante P. I. Capaldi, Khadija Sheikh, Aaron Fenster, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCOPDMedicineImage registrationRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingPulmonary function testingMedical imagingLungComputer scienceInternal medicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Recent pulmonary imaging research has revealed that in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) and asthma, structural and functional abnormalities are spatially heterogeneous. This novel information may help optimize treatment in individual patients, monitor interventional efficacy, and develop new treatments. Moreover, by automating the measurement of regional biomarkers for the 19 different anatomical lung segments, there is an opportunity to embed imaging biomarkers into clinically acceptable clinical workflows and improve lung disease clinical care. Therefore, to exploit the regional structure–function information provided by thoracic imaging, and as a first step toward this goal, our objective was to develop a fully automated registration pipeline for thoracic x‐ray computed tomography ( CT ) and inhaled gas functional magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) whole lung and segmental structure–function biomarkers. Methods Thirty‐five patients including 15 severe, poorly controlled asthmatics and 20 COPD patients [classified according to the global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease ( GOLD ) criteria)] provided written informed consent to a study protocol approved by Health Canada and underwent pulmonary function tests, MRI , and CT during a single 2‐hour visit. Using this diverse patient dataset, we developed and evaluated a joint deformable registration approach to simultaneously coregister CT with both 1 H and 3 He MRI by enforcing the similarity of the deformation fields from the two individual registrations. We derived a simpler model that was equivalent to the original challenging optimization problem through variational analysis and the simpler model gave rise to an efficient numerical solver that was parallelized on a graphics processing unit. The coregistered CT ‐ 3 He MRI and whole lung/segmental lung masks were used to generate whole lung and segmental 3 He MRI ventilation defect percent ( VDP ). To estimate fiducial localization reproducibility, a single observer manually identified 109 pairs of CT and 3 He MRI fiducials for 35 patient images on five separate occasions and determined the fiducial localization error ( FLE ). CT ‐ 3 He MRI registration accuracy was evaluated using the target registration error ( TRE ). Whole lung VDP generated using the algorithm was compared with VDP generated using a previously validated semiautomated approach and computational efficiency was evaluated using run time. Results In 35 patients including 15 with severe asthma and 20 with COPD , mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s ( FEV 1 ) was 63±24% pred and FEV 1 /forced vital capacity ( FVC ) was 54 ± 17%. FLE was 0.16 mm and 0.34 mm for 3 He MRI and CT , respectively. TRE was 4.5 ± 2.0 mm, 4.0 ± 1.7 mm, 4.8 ± 2.3 mm for asthma, COPD GOLD II , and GOLD III groups, respectively, with a mean of 4.4 ± 2.0 mm for the entire dataset. TRE was significantly improved for joint CT ‐ 1 H/ 3 He MRI registration compared with CT ‐ 1 H MRI rigid registration ( P &lt; 0.0001). Whole lung VDP generated using the pipeline was not significantly different ( P = 0.37) compared to a semiautomated method with which it was strongly correlated (r = 0.93, P &lt; 0.0001). The fully automated pipeline required 11 ± 0.4 min to generate whole lung and segmental VDP . Conclusions For a diverse group of patients with COPD and asthma, whole lung and segmental VDP was measured using an automated lung image analysis pipeline which provides a way to incorporate lung functional biomarkers into clinical research and patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207