MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2588208806 · doi:10.18174/139676

Storage of Hatching Eggs : Effects of storage and early incubation conditions on egg characteristics, embryonic development, hatchability, and chicken quality

2010· dissertation· en· W2588208806 on OpenAlexfundno aff
I.A.M. Reijrink

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit MaastrichtUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsIncubationHatchingBiologyAnimal scienceEmbryogenesisIncubation periodEmbryoAndrologyFisheryBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key words: egg storage, embryonic development, albumen quality, hatchability, chick quality It is well known that an increase in the storage duration increases incubation duration and decreases hatchability and chick quality. The negative effects of prolonged egg storage (> 7 days) may be caused by changes in the embryo, in the egg characteristics, or by both. The first aim of the current thesis was to investigate which physiological mechanisms are involved in the negative effects of prolonged egg storage on hatchability and chick quality. The second aim was to investigate how these negative effects of prolonged egg storage can be reduced by making changes in storage or early incubation conditions. Treatments, such as prestorage incubation, frequent warming during storage, a change in the storage air composition, different preincubation warming profiles, and hypercapnic incubation during the first 5 days of incubation were used in the current thesis to gain more insight in the cause of the negative effects of prolonged egg storage. Prestorage incubation and frequent warming during storage increased the stage of embryonic development and the number of viable embryonic cells. The effect of these treatments on hatchability was nihil, positive or negative and seems to depend on the stage of embryonic development before and after the treatment. The storage air compositions, studied in the current thesis did not affect embryonic development, hatchability, or chick quality, when eggs were stored for 14 days. This suggests that changes in albumen quality during storage do not affect hatchability and chick quality. The 24-h preincubation warming profile decreased embryonic mortality during the first 9 days of incubation in comparison with the 4-h preincubation warming profile when eggs were stored for 13 days. Hypercapnic incubation during the first 5 days of incubation decreased albumen pH during early incubation, but did not improve hatchability. In conclusion, embryo characteristics seem to have a more important role in the negative effects of prolonged egg storage than changes in the egg characteristics, such as changes in the albumen pH and albumen height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→