Clinical trials in minimal change disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minimal change disease (MCD) is a pathological condition characterized by subtle glomerular lesions causing massive and reversible proteinuria that is usually steroid sensitive. Recurrence of symptoms of active disease following successful treatment (including proteinuria, oedema and oliguria) and steroid toxicity requires the use of other drugs to attain or maintain remission. Unresolved MCD is considered the initial step in the pathological pathway leading to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Historically, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, mycophenolate and calcineurin inhibitors have been utilized with success in MCD; however, the chronic nature of the disease and the toxicity of long-term use of these medications has pushed the development of new therapies. Synthetic corticotropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, for example, are currently under investigation in clinical trials. In addition, these new interventions have dramatically impacted our understanding of the mechanisms of the disease. Phase II-IV clinical trials targeting new mechanisms and/or molecules are in progress. The list is long and includes drugs blocking the adaptive immune system (abatacept and anti-CD40 antibodies), as well as retinoids and the sialic acid precursor N-acetyl-D-mannosamine (ManNAc), two agents that affect the sieving properties of the glomerular basement membrane. Other drugs are being tested against FSGS and, if successful, could also be utilized against MCD. Clinical trials currently in progress should furnish a proper solution to what appears to be a solvable problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".