Françoise Briegel et Michel Porret [dir.], Le criminel endurci. Récidive et récidivistes du Moyen Âge au xxe siècle. Actes du colloque de l’International Association for the History of Crime and Criminal Justice tenu à Genève du 6 au 8 juin 2002, Droz, Genève, 2006, 395 p. ISBN : 2-600-01033-5. 50 francs suisses.Claire Dolan [dir.], Entre justice et justiciables : les auxiliaires de la justice du Moyen Âge au xxe siècle. Actes du Colloque tenu à Québec du 15 au 17 septembre 2004, Presses universitaires de Laval, Canada, 2005, 828 p. ISBN : 2-7637-8268-X. 50 dollars canadiens.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La parution de deux imposants ouvrages collectifs consacrés à l’histoire de la justice dans une périodisation longue qui s’étend du Moyen Âge au xxesiècle montre le dynamisme actuel de ce champ. Le criminel endurci. Récidive et récidivistes du Moyen Âge au xxesiècle poursuit la série de colloques genevois (Le corps violenté ; Homo criminalis. Pratiques et doctrines médico-légales ; Beccaria et la culture juridique des Lumières ) qui proposent une histoire sociale du crime et du système pénal...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".