MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588351941 · doi:10.22409/mov.v0i5.32615

ATUAÇÃO DOS GOVERNOS ESTADUAIS NA EFETIVAÇÃO DO ACESSO À EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL: tema para o debate

2017· article· pt· W2588351941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMovimento · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSafeguardingState (computer science)Public administrationHumanitiesPhilosophyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre o direito à Educação Infantil no Brasil,de modo a indagar sobre a participação dos governos estaduais na garantia dessedireito, considerado um dever do Estado cuja viabilização depende do efetivo exercíciode colaboração entre os entes federados. Neste caso, opta-se por analisar informaçõessobre o conjunto dos estados brasileiros, como: as performances das matrículasestaduais nesta etapa; os PIBs dos respectivos estados e os partidos políticos dasgestões governamentais iniciadas a partir da vigência da Lei de ResponsabilidadeFiscal. Ressalta-se a necessidade de revisão do pacto federativo no âmbito de formasde cooperação para a oferta da Educação Infantil no país, também como forma decombate à privatização e precarização do atendimento educacional das criançaspequenas.Palavras-chave: Educação Infantil; governos estaduais; cooperação federativa; partidos políticosThe purpose of the this paper is to reflect upon the right to Early Childhood Education inBrazil, in such a way as inquire the role of local state governments in safeguarding suchright, one that is deemed to be a State responsibility and whose accomplishmentdepends on the actual collaboration among the federated states. In the present case, wehave decided to analyze information on the Brazilian federated states as a whole, suchas the number of actual enrollments in this stage of education, the states’ GDP, and thepolitical parties ahead of the government administrations as from the enactment of theFiscal Responsibility Law. We emphasize the need for a revision of the federalagreement as regards the cooperation mechanisms relating to the offer of EarlyChildhood Education in the country, also as way to oppose the privatization anddebilitation of the educational services provided to young children.Keywords: Early childhood education; state governments; federalist cooperation;political parties

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it