ATUAÇÃO DOS GOVERNOS ESTADUAIS NA EFETIVAÇÃO DO ACESSO À EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL: tema para o debate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem como objetivo refletir sobre o direito à Educação Infantil no Brasil,de modo a indagar sobre a participação dos governos estaduais na garantia dessedireito, considerado um dever do Estado cuja viabilização depende do efetivo exercíciode colaboração entre os entes federados. Neste caso, opta-se por analisar informaçõessobre o conjunto dos estados brasileiros, como: as performances das matrículasestaduais nesta etapa; os PIBs dos respectivos estados e os partidos políticos dasgestões governamentais iniciadas a partir da vigência da Lei de ResponsabilidadeFiscal. Ressalta-se a necessidade de revisão do pacto federativo no âmbito de formasde cooperação para a oferta da Educação Infantil no país, também como forma decombate à privatização e precarização do atendimento educacional das criançaspequenas.Palavras-chave: Educação Infantil; governos estaduais; cooperação federativa; partidos políticosThe purpose of the this paper is to reflect upon the right to Early Childhood Education inBrazil, in such a way as inquire the role of local state governments in safeguarding suchright, one that is deemed to be a State responsibility and whose accomplishmentdepends on the actual collaboration among the federated states. In the present case, wehave decided to analyze information on the Brazilian federated states as a whole, suchas the number of actual enrollments in this stage of education, the states’ GDP, and thepolitical parties ahead of the government administrations as from the enactment of theFiscal Responsibility Law. We emphasize the need for a revision of the federalagreement as regards the cooperation mechanisms relating to the offer of EarlyChildhood Education in the country, also as way to oppose the privatization anddebilitation of the educational services provided to young children.Keywords: Early childhood education; state governments; federalist cooperation;political parties
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".