MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588354308 · doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2016.0557

Torque and state estimation for real‐time implementation of multivariable control in sensorless induction motor drives

2017· article· en· W2588354308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electric Power Applications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariable calculusControl theory (sociology)Induction motorTorqueDirect torque controlControl engineeringState (computer science)EstimationControl (management)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a strategy for estimating the states and the load torque to implement a feedback linearisation controller for induction motor drives. The multivariable control is carried out using input–output linearisation feedback law in order to track profiles of the rotational speed and the rotor flux amplitude. The unknown load torque is compensated by an estimator based on the speed error. The state estimation requires only the measurements of the stator voltages–currents. The estimation method is not invasive as no mechanical sensors are needed. Experimental platform equipped with sensors at the load side, for measuring the speed and the torque of the motor driven by the Opal‐RT real‐time system, was implemented to verify the accuracy of the proposed estimation method to implement the multivariable control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it