MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588446979 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15308

NRIP/DCAF6 stabilizes the androgen receptor protein by displacing DDB2 from the CUL4A-DDB1 E3 ligase complex in prostate cancer

2017· article· en· W2588446979 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hsin‐Hsiung Chen, Ping Fan, Szu‐Wei Chang, Yeou‐Ping Tsao, Hsiang–Po Huang, Show‐Li Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Taiwan UniversityNational Health Research Institutes
KeywordsDDB1Androgen receptorProstate cancerUbiquitin ligaseCancer researchCancerMedicineLNCaPChemistryBiologyUbiquitinInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Hsin-Hsiung Chen 1, * , Ping Fan 1, * , Szu-Wei Chang 1, * , Yeou-Ping Tsao 2 , Hsiang-Po Huang 3 , Show-Li Chen 1 1 Graduate Institute of Microbiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan 3 Graduate Institute of Medical Genetics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Show-Li Chen, email: showlic@ntu.edu.tw Hsiang-Po Huang, email: hh691290@gmail.com Keywords: NRIP/DCAF6, DDB2, AR, Cul4-DDB1, cribriform prostate cancer Received: October 27, 2016 Accepted: January 27, 2017 Published: February 14, 2017 ABSTRACT Both nuclear receptor interaction protein (NRIP) and DNA damage binding protein 2 (DDB2) belong to the Cullin 4 (CUL4)-DDB1 binding protein family and are androgen receptor (AR)-interacting proteins. Here, we investigated the expression patterns of the NRIP, DDB2 and AR proteins in human prostate cancer tissues and found that the expression levels of NRIP and AR were higher, but the DDB2 level was lower, in prostate cancer tissues than in non-neoplastic controls, suggesting NRIP as a candidate tumor promoter and DDB2 as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. Furthermore, both NRIP and DDB2 shared the same AR binding domain; they were competitors for the AR, but not for DDB1 binding, in the AR-DDB2-DDB1-CUL4A complex. Conclusively, NRIP stabilizes the AR protein by displacing DDB2 from the AR-DDB2 complex. Consistent with our hypothesis, a specific expression pattern with high levels of NRIP and AR, together with a low level of DDB2, was found more frequently in the human prostate cancer tissues with a cribriform pattern than in non-cribriform tumors, suggesting that disruption of the balance between NRIP and DDB2 may change AR protein homeostasis and contribute to pathogenesis in certain aggressive types of prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207