Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the experiences in offering data mining (DM) workshops at University of Norbert Wiener (UNW) in Lima, Peru. This educational initiative is a result of a longstanding collaboration between the Faculty of Engineering and Business at UNW and Thompson Rivers University in Canada. The workshops were offered in May 2014 and May 2015, and had three learning objectives: (1) to acquire practical skills (hands-on experience) in DM, (2) to solve problems using computer systems in bioinformatics and engineering, and (3) to learn fundamental DM concepts and techniques simultaneously in two languages: English and Spanish. The bilingual aspect of the DM workshops was very important, because the students had not only the opportunity to learn advanced computer skills, but also to learn complex terminology in two languages. Bilingualism (Spanish, English) is an important growth factor for the Peruvian economy, and students' bilingual fluency in technical terminology is mandatory for their participation in the development and use of advanced technologies, such as, applications of DM in biomedicine and engineering. In this paper, we present how we have met these three educational objectives using methods based on experiential learning, problem-based learning, and bilingual education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".