MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588478439 · doi:10.1615/tsfp6.1990

REYNOLDS STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN THE WAKE OF A STACK PARTIALLY IMMERSED IN A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER

2009· article· en· W2588478439 on OpenAlexaff
Muyiwa S. Adaramola, Donald J. Bergstrom, David S. Sumner

Bibliographic record

VenueProceeding of Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeReynolds stressBoundary layerTurbulenceReynolds numberMechanicsStack (abstract data type)Boundary layer thicknessWind tunnelPhysicsShear stressMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some characteristics of the Reynolds stress field in the wake of a stack were experimentally studied in a low-speed wind tunnel using thermal anemometry. The cross-flow Reynolds number was ReD = 2.3×104, and the jet-to-cross-flow velocity ratio was varied from R = 0 to 3. The stack was partially immersed in a flat-plate turbulent boundary layer, with a boundary layer thickness-to-stack-height ratio of δ/H = 0.5 at the location of the stack. The spanwise characteristics of the time-averaged streamwise and wallnormal velocities varied along the stack height (z/H) and with the value of R. Likewise, the streamwise and wallnormal turbulence intensities as well as the Reynolds shear stress varied with the stack height z/H and were strongly influenced by the value of R. The behaviour of the shear correlation coefficient indicated that there is more turbulent mixing within the vicinity of the free end of the stack than at mid-height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceeding of Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow PhenomenaSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207