Multikulturalisme-Bhinneka Tunggal lka Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Wahana Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bhinneka Tunggal Ika yang secara harfiah diartikan sebagai bercerai berai tetapi satu merupakan ilustrasi dari jati diri bangsa Indonesia yang secara natural, dan sosial-kultural dibangun di alas keanekaragaman. (etnis, bahasa, budaya, dll). Secara akademis, konsep bhinneka tunggal ika tersebut dapatdipahami dalam konteks konsep generik multiculturalism atau multikulturalisme. Dalam konteks itu, komitmen final tentang NKRI, Pembukaan UUD 1945 yang diterima secara konsisten dengan Pancasila di dalamnya, wawasan Nusantara yang mempersatukan wilayah Indonesia dari Sabang sampai Merauke serta pengakuan kebudayaan Indonesia yang merajut puncak-puncak budaya dari semua etnis yang ada di Indonesia, merupakan indikasi yang kuat bahwa Indonesia tidak menganut konsep American's melting pot, atau Australia's ethnic selection, atau Malaysia's three ethnicity coexistence, atau Argentina's social cultrural assortment tetapi merupakan eclectic model dari Canada's cultural mosaic dengan konsepsi Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Mpu Tantular
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".