Longterm Outcomes of Renal Artery Involvement in Takayasu Arteritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Takayasu arteritis (TA) involving the renal artery can result in hypertension (HTN), renal dysfunction, and premature death. The aim of this study was to investigate the longterm outcomes and factors that predict outcomes in patients with TA with renal artery stenosis. METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with TA between January 1997 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Renal artery involvement was based on computed tomography and/or angiography findings. Poor outcome was defined as refractory HTN, chronic renal insufficiency, or death. RESULTS: Of the 62 TA patients with renal artery involvement, 11 (17.7%) underwent renal artery revascularization. Younger age, male sex, and more severe stenosis (> 70%) were associated with vascular intervention. After a median followup of 90.6 months, 11 (17.7%) of the 62 patients had refractory HTN and 6 (9.7%) had chronic renal insufficiency. Renal insufficiency [5/15 (33.3%) vs 3/47 (6.4%), p = 0.016] and bilateral involvement [12/15 (80.0%) vs 23/47 (48.9%), p = 0.041] were significantly more frequent in patients with poor than good outcomes. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that renal insufficiency at presentation (HR 13.778, 95% CI 3.530-53.786, p < 0.001) and bilateral renal artery involvement (HR 5.053, 95% CI 1.179-21.661, p = 0.029) were significant risk factors for poor outcomes at followup, but performance of revascularization procedure was not (HR 0.663, 95% CI 0.176-2.498, p = 0.543). CONCLUSION: Bilateral lesions and renal functional impairment at presentation, but not implementation of revascularization procedures, were significant factors for outcomes in TA patients with renal artery involvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".