Iterative Graph-Based Filtering for Image Abstraction and Stylization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this brief, motivated by the recent advances in graph signal processing, we address the problem of image abstraction and stylization. A novel unified graph-based multi-layer framework is proposed to perform iterative filtering without requiring any weight updates. The proposed graph-based filtering approach is shown to be superior to other existing methods due to iteratively using the filtered Laplacian in order to enhance the smoothened image signal at each layer. In order to render real images into painterly style ones and create a simple stylized format from color images, the low-contrast regions of an image are first smoothened using the proposed iterative graph filters in either vertex or spectral domains. The abstracted image is then quantized and sharpened using the proposed iterative highpass graph filter. The effectiveness of the graph-based image stylization method is verified through several experiments. It is shown that the proposed method can yield significantly improved visual quality for stylized images as compared to other existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it