MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588583495 · doi:10.1109/antem.2005.7852095

Exact analytical solution for the losses in and forces on an induced conducting spheroid

2005· article· en· W2588583495 on OpenAlexaff
K. A. S. N. Jayasekera, I.R. Ciric

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpheroidHelmholtz equationProlate spheroidLaplace's equationPhysicsRotational symmetryLaplace transformCurrent (fluid)Exact solutions in general relativityMagnetic fieldVector potentialNernst equationSeparation of variablesMagnetic potentialClassical mechanicsOblate spheroidMathematical analysisMechanicsDifferential equationMathematicsPartial differential equationChemistryBoundary value problemQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical solution is presented for the induced currents in highly conducting prolate and oblate spheroids due to the presence of an external axisymmetric inducing field produced by carrying-current circular turns. Exact analytical expressions are derived for the magnetic vector potential, the power losses and the forces acting upon the spheroids. The magnetic vector potential outside and inside the conducting spheroids is determined by solving the vector Laplace equation and the vector Helmholtz equation, respectively, using the method of separation of variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsFrench-language works237,207