MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588583495 · doi:10.1109/antem.2005.7852095

Exact analytical solution for the losses in and forces on an induced conducting spheroid

2005· article· en· W2588583495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpheroidHelmholtz equationProlate spheroidLaplace's equationPhysicsRotational symmetryLaplace transformCurrent (fluid)Exact solutions in general relativityMagnetic fieldVector potentialNernst equationSeparation of variablesMagnetic potentialClassical mechanicsOblate spheroidMathematical analysisMechanicsDifferential equationMathematicsPartial differential equationChemistryBoundary value problemQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical solution is presented for the induced currents in highly conducting prolate and oblate spheroids due to the presence of an external axisymmetric inducing field produced by carrying-current circular turns. Exact analytical expressions are derived for the magnetic vector potential, the power losses and the forces acting upon the spheroids. The magnetic vector potential outside and inside the conducting spheroids is determined by solving the vector Laplace equation and the vector Helmholtz equation, respectively, using the method of separation of variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsFrench-language works237,207