Efficient Joint User Association and Resource Allocation for Cloud Radio Access Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coordinated scheduling is an efficient resource allocation technique employed to improve the throughput, utilization, and energy efficiency of radio networks. This work focuses on the coordinated scheduling problem for cloud radio access network (CRAN). In particular, we consider the downlink of a CRAN where a central cloud performs the scheduling and synchronization of transmitting frames across the base stations (BSs). For each BS, the transmit frame is composed of several time/frequency slots called resource blocks (RBs). We formulate an optimization problem for joint users to BS association and resource allocation with an objective to maximize the overall network utilization under practical network constraints. The formulated problem is combinatorial and an optimal solution of such a problem can be obtained by performing an exhaustive search over all possible users-to-BSs assignments that satisfy the network constraints. However, the size of search space increases exponentially with the number of users, BSs, and RBs, thus making this approach prohibitive for networks of practical size. This work proposes an interference-aware greedy heuristic algorithm for the constrained coordinated scheduling problem. The complexity analysis of the proposed heuristic is also presented and performance is compared with the optimal exhaustive search algorithm. Simulation results are presented for various network scenarios which demonstrate that the proposed solution achieves performance comparable to the optimal exhaustive search algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it