MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588622644 · doi:10.1139/cjss-2016-0064

CALIBRATION OF WHATMAN GRADE 42 FILTER PAPER FOR SOIL SUCTION MEASUREMENT

2016· article· en· W2588622644 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hobi Kim, Mônica Prezzi, Rodrigo Salgado

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationFilter paperCalibration curveSuctionFilter (signal processing)Curve fittingEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceMathematicsChromatographyChemistryComputer scienceEngineeringStatisticsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The filter paper technique consists of obtaining the equilibrium water content of a filter paper that is either in direct contact with a soil sample or inside an airtight container together with the sample but not in direct contact with it. After the final water content of the filter paper is determined, the suction in the soil is estimated from a previously established calibration curve relating the filter paper water content and suction. The ASTM D5298-10 calibration curve is routinely used for indirect suction estimation from Whatman Grade 42 filter paper water content measurements. This note identifies limitations in the calibration curve in ASTM D5298-10 that lead to inaccuracies in the estimation of suction values, particularly for very low filter paper water contents. The paper proposes new equations not subject to these limitations for the calibration curve for Whatman Grade 42 filter paper using the same data used to construct the calibration curve in ASTM D5298-10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207