MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588699846 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw158.13

SP085DUALITY OF CALCITRIOL-BASED INHIBITION OR PROPAGATION OF VASCULAR CALCIFICATION IN VITRO IS DEPENDENT ON NORMAL OR HIGH CALCIUM LEVELS, RESPECTIVELY

2016· article· en· W2588699846 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Svajger, Rachel M. Holden, Michael A. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcitriolMedicineCalcificationCalciumIn vitroInternal medicineEndocrinologyUrologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Aims: Calcitriol (1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) is used to mitigate secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the use of calcitriol has been found in vitro and in vivo to paradoxically both inhibit and increase vascular calcification (VC), a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: The study’s objective was to examine the impact of calcitriol on aortic calcification in vitro when exposed to different medium concentrations of Ca2+ and PO43-. Aortic tissue was harvested from 16 week-old Sprague Dawley rats (n = 12), with whole rings incubated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) for 4 days. Incubation treatments consisted of control (Group 1, 0.9mM PO43- & 1.6mM Ca2+), high Ca2+ and low PO43- (Group 2, 0.9mM PO43- & 3.2mM Ca2+), normal Ca2+ and high PO43- (Group 3, 3.8mM PO43- & 1.6mM Ca2+), and high Ca2+ and high PO43- (Group 4, 3.8mM PO43- & 1.6mM Ca2+). Calcitriol (0nM, 1nM, 10nM, or 100nM) was added to different DMEM treatments. Media was switched every 48hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207