MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588752851 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw164.23

SP279CHANGE IN SKIN AUTOFLOURESCENCE OVER ONE YEAR PREDICTS MORTALITY AT FIVE YEARS IN A PROSPECTIVE COHORT OF PEOPLE WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE STAGE 3

2016· article· en· W2588752851 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Shardlow, Natasha J. McIntyre, Richard Fluck, Chris McIntyre, Maarten W. Taal

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseProspective cohort studyCohortStage (stratigraphy)Cohort studyDiseaseEnd stage renal diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Aims: Tissue advanced glycation end product (AGE) accumulation is a marker of cumulative metabolic stress assessed by a simple non-invasive measurement of skin autofluoresence (SAF). This has been shown to predict mortality in haemodialysis patients and in earlier CKD in some studies, but the impact of change in SAF over time has not previously been reported. In this study we sought to investigate the associations of SAF and change in SAF over time with mortality in people with CKD stage 3. Methods: 1741 people with CKD 3 (confirmed by two eGFR values) were recruited from primary care. Participants attended for baseline, year 1 and year 5 study visits and underwent clinical assessment, blood and serum biochemistry. At each visit, 3 measurements of skin autofluorescence were recorded from the skin of the forearm of each participant. The mean of these values was used in analyses. Mortality data were collected from hospital and national records (Office of National Statistics).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207