MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588787215 · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001287

Side effects and tolerability of combination blood pressure lowering according to blood pressure levels

2017· article· en· W2588787215 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Atkins, Yoichiro Hirakawa, Abdul Salam, Mark Woodward, Mark E. Cooper, Pavel Hamet, Stephen Harrap, Kennedy R. Lees, Lisheng Liu, Giuseppe Mancia, Michel Marre, Vlado Perkovic, Neil R Poulter, Bryan Williams, John Chalmers, Anthony Rodgers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersMerck Sharp and DohmeMedical Research CouncilNovo NordiskNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchServierAmgenPfizerAstraZenecaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationTolerabilityBlood pressurePlaceboInternal medicinePerindoprilCombination therapyStroke (engine)AnesthesiaAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To measure the placebo-controlled effects of combination therapy on hypotension, treatment discontinuation, and major renal outcomes, according to baseline blood pressure. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of the action in diabetes and vascular disease: preterax and diamicron-MR controlled evaluation ADVANCE and perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study PROGRESS trials, including 14 684 participants allocated combination therapy or placebo. The mean age was 65 years, 61% were men, and 64% were receiving background blood pressure lowering (BPL) therapy. Participants were stratified into five subgroups by baseline SBP less than 120, 120-129, 130-139, 140-159, and at least 160 mmHg. Discontinuation of study treatment during the active run-in phase and postrandomization follow-up was assessed for hypotension/dizziness and other causes. Major renal outcomes (sustained doubling in creatinine or renal death) were also assessed. RESULTS: Discontinuation during the 4-6-week active run-in phase due to hypotension/dizziness ranged from 3.6% in those with SBP less than 120 mmHg to 1.3% in those with SBP at least 160 mmHg. Median follow-up in the randomized phase was 5.6 years, and discontinuation for hypotension was higher with combination therapy compared with placebo in the less than 120 mmHg group (4.7 vs. 1.2%). However, for each subgroup with baseline SBP 120-129, 130-139, and 140-159 mmHg, the absolute excess of discontinuation due to hypotension with combination therapy was 0.7%. Total discontinuations were only increased in the less than 120 mmHg group (18.4 vs. 12.5%) and the 120-129-mmHg subgroup (17.6 vs. 14.2%). There were no clear differences across the SBP subgroups for the combined renal outcome (overall, 0.8 vs. 0.6%). CONCLUSION: Compared with those with baseline SBP 140-159 mmHg, side effects of dual combination BPL are essentially the same for people with SBP 130-139 mmHg and only modestly increased among patients with SBP 120-129 mmHg. During long-term therapy, side effects sufficient to stop treatment that are treatment related (i.e. occur in excess of rates seen with placebo) occur at less than 0.5%/year in patients with baseline SBP 120-139 mmHg. These results have important implications in assessing the likely balance of benefits and side effects of BPL with combination therapy among those with SBP 120-139 mmHg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207