MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A two level finite volume method for Perona and Malik equation used in denoising

2016· article· en· W2588854548 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Guoliang He, Liu Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsFinite volume methodPartial differential equationApplied mathematicsMathematicsNonlinear systemNoise reductionDiffusion equationDiffusionImage denoisingFinite difference methodAlgorithmMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of image processing methods based on partial differential equations, such as denoising, restoration, segmentation and so on, is an emerging field in the last decade, where a large number of models are second order nonlinear diffusion equations. In this article, we present a two level finite volume method to solve the Perona and Malik (P-M) equation. The method involves solving one small implicit Perona and Malik problem on the coarse mesh system, and an explicit Perona and Malik problem on the fine mesh. The numerical results demonstrate that the two level method is efficient and can save a large amount of computational time than the standard FVM method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207