MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588857715 · doi:10.1002/anie.201610544

Ultrasensitive Fluorogenic Reagents for Neuraminidase Titration

2017· article· en· W2588857715 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhizeng Gao, Masahiro Niikura, Stephen G. Withers

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuraminidaseTitrationReagentChemistryNeuraminidase inhibitorVirologyVirusInfluenza A virusInfluenza vaccineBiologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Organic chemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Influenza viral neuraminidase plays a crucial role during infections. It is a major target for the development of anti‐influenza drugs and is also attracting increasing attention as a vaccine target as evidence accumulates that neuraminidase‐neutralizing antibodies contribute to protection. However, no method currently exists to accurately and efficiently measure concentrations of active neuraminidase in virus samples or other crude mixtures, which hampers development on both fronts. In this report, we describe the development of a selective and sensitive active‐site titration reagent for neuraminidase that can quantify viral neuraminidases down to sub‐nanomolar levels in crude samples, with no background from non‐viral neuraminidases. By using this reagent, we determined accurate kcat values for six influenza A and two influenza B neuraminidases for the first time. We also quantified the neuraminidase content in a commercial influenza vaccine, thus demonstrating that this titration reagent opens the possibility for better vaccine analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207