As Diretrizes Curriculares da ABEPSS e os valores éticos e políticos para a formação profissional em Serviço Social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo é oriundo das construções e reflexões acerca do Projeto Ético-Político no âmbito da Formação Profissional em Serviço Social. Objetiva refletir sobre a importância do fortalecimento do projeto de Formação Profissional hegemônico da categoria, nos marcos da púbere direção social, ética e política da profissão, engendrada na teoria social marxista, na perspectiva de intenção de ruptura, enfatizando as Diretrizes Curriculares da ABEPSS de 1996 enquanto referência para a formação nesta proposta crítica. Finda com reflexões que abalizam desafios presentes na atual contextura e a tarefa imperativa das entidades da categoria (ABEPSS, CFESS/CRESS e ENESSO) na construção de ações políticas e coletivas unificadas com as bases, com vistas ao fortalecimento deste projeto de formação que confere também a um projeto de sociedade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".