MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588894861 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw187.03

MP197EARLY MORTALITY ON CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY (CRRT): THE PRAIRIE CRRT STUDY

2016· article· en· W2588894861 on OpenAlexaff
Bhanu Prasad, Michelle Urbanski, Erwin Karreman

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRegina Qu'Appelle Health Region
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal replacement therapyIntensive care medicineHemodialysisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and Aims: Patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) have an increased short-term and long-term risk of mortality. In most North American ICUs, these patients require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). CRRT is resource intensive and the natural history of patients requiring CRRT in the ICU is poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing CRRT for AKI in three ICU’s of the Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region (RQHR). We collected data on demographic, laboratory and clinical measures and followed patients from admission to the ICU to 9 months post discharge in the community. Results: Of the 2634 patients admitted to the ICUs in the study period (April 2013 to September 2014), (2201/2634) 83.6% had no AKI. 269 or 10.2% had stage III AKI. 106/269 (40%) were started on CRRT. Of those on CRRT, 66/106 died in ICU whilst on CRRT. 17/66 (26%) died within 24 hours of initiating therapy. Patients who died within 24 hours had a higher FiO2 (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 0.6 ±0.2, p: 0.011); higher epinephrine (32.0 ± 29.9 vs. 6.5 ± 9.3, p: 0.005); higher norepinephrine levels (39.4 ± 23.5 vs. 19.6 ± 14.2, p:0. 005); lower pH (7.1 ± 0.2 vs. 7.3 ± 0.1, p: 0.005) when compared to those who survived the first 24 hours of admission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207