STRUKTUR ANATOMI, SIFAT FISIS DAN MEKANIS KAYlJ KUMEA BATU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was carried out to examine the anatomical structure/characteristics, and physical and mechanical properties of lesser-known kumea batu ( H.J.L.) wood.Wood samples of this species was taken from natural production forest growing in Lampia Sub Regency, East Luwu District, West Sulawesi Province.The results revealed that kumea batu wood had a reddish light brown colour of sapwood and reddish brown colour of heartwood.Wood growth rings were diffuse and sometimes appeared clearly with figures of decorative surface in form of parallel lines on radial section with straight grain, fine texture, and glossy surface.In averages, fiber length was 677.55 µm, fiber diameter 22.15 µm, lumen diameter 1.94 µm, and fiber-wall thickness 10.10 µm.Assessment on the derived values of fiber dimensions for pulp/paper manufacture revealed that kumea batu wood belonged to class IV.This wood species was remarkably heavy (specific gravity 0,92), considerably high in dimensional shrinkage.It had ultimate bending strength at 612.72 kg/cm , compression strength parallel to grain 402.28 kg/cm and was classified in wood strength as class II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".