MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2588960046

The Influence of Certain Cultural Practices on Solanine Content and Tuber Yields in Netted Gem Potatoes1

2016· article· en· W2588960046 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allan C. Hutchinson, R. J. Hilton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of agricultural science/Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSowingFertilizerYield (engineering)IrrigationHorticultureAgronomyFrost (temperature)CropBiologyChemistryGeographyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bitter flavour which sometimes occurs in Netted Gem potatoes is attributed to abnormal accumulation in the tuber of the glycoalkaloid solanine To determine the effect of cultural practices on solanine content, plots of Netted Gem potatoes at Edmonton were subjected for two seasons to treatments that included two depths of planting, three levels of hilling, and two dates of planting with single-eye and multiple-eye seed-pieces The differences in cultural treatment were not associated with any differences in solanine content or yield of tubers in either season The solanine content of tuber samples collected from a fertilizer trial under irrigation at Brooks, Alberta, failed to reveal any significant effect of differences in fertilizer treatment, but a marked increase in tuber solanine occurred after a top-killing frost Very bitter tuber samples from several locations in Alberta contained toxic levels of solanine, but showed no greening of tubers Investigation showed that usually one or more unfavourable...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of agricultural science/Canadian Journal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207