BCL2 Is Highly Mutated In Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4187 Background. Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL), which comprise the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, can be further classified at the molecular level into activated B-cell (ABC) type and germinal centre B-cell (GCB) type. The t(14;18) translocation, which juxtaposes BCL2 to the immunoglobulin heavy gene, is frequent in the GCB subtype, while BCL2 can be up-regulated by gene amplifications and activation of the NF-kB pathway in the ABC subtype. We have recently recently re-sequenced DLBCL transcriptomes and have reported that EZH2 is recurrently mutated in the germinal center lymphomas (Morin et al., Nature Genetics 2010). This project also revealed that the gene containing the most variants was BCL2. The aim of this project was to determine the incidence and clinical significance of BCL2 mutations in a larger cohort of de novo DLBCL samples and matched germline in a subset of cases. In addition, the specificity of BCL2 to DLBCL was determined by sequencing the BCL2 gene in other lymphoma subtypes. Methods. 31 cases of DLBCL were subjected to whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing as part of the EZH2 study. The presence of BCL2 variants was determined using the Bayesian variant caller “SNVmix”. The BCL2 gene (exons 1–3) was re-sequenced using the Sanger method in a total of 514 samples, of which 349 cases were primary DLBCL, 30 were small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), 26 were follicular lymphoma (FL), 25 were mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 25 were peripheral T cell lymphoma, 8 were purified centroblasts and 51 were germline DNA from patients who had DLBCL or FL in this study. The presence of the translocation t(14;18) was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 145 DLBCL samples and by karyotype in 26 FL samples. The presence of BCL2 protein expression was determined using clone 124 (Dako) in 284 cases. The association between the presence of mutations and other variables was determined using the Fisher's exact test and the association to overall survival (OS) was determined using the log Rank test. Results. In whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing of 31 DLBCL samples, we found BCL2 to contain expressed point mutations in 11/31 cases, including a total of 19 non-synonymous mutations and 30 synonymous mutations. Sanger sequencing revealed BCL2 mutations in 117/349 DLBCL, 22/26 FL, 3/25 MCL, 1/30 SLL and 2/25 PTCL and no mutations were identified in the germline samples or purified centroblasts. The presence of BCL2 mutations was associated with the GCB phenotype (p = 7.6×10-7) and was enriched in t(14;18)-positive cases. The ratio of transitions to transversions was 1.47, suggestive that these mutations were inserted as a consequence of somatic hypermutation (p = 6.28 × 10-21). Non-synonymous mutations occurred in 41 DLBCL cases and were predominantly located in the flexible loop domain and between the BH1 and BH3 domains while sparing all the BH domains, which are responsible for anti-apoptotic function. Despite this, BCL2 protein was present in 238/284 cases using the Dako antibody. Non-synonymous mutations in BCL2 were not associated with an inferior OS or PFS, even within the GCB subtype. Conclusions. BCL2 mutations in DLBCL and FL are much more prevalent than previously anticipated and appear to be a consequence of on-going somatic hypermutation in the germinal center. The functional and clinical significance of these mutations should be studied further, given that BH3 mimetics may eventually be considered as therapeutic options in these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".