MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589027849 · doi:10.4000/ifha.791

KROLL, Frank-Lothar, Die Herrscher Sachsens. Markgrafen, Kurfürsten, Könige 1089-1918

2013· article· fr· W2589027849 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Duhamelle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les éditions Beck poursuivent la publication d’ouvrages de qualité rassemblant des biographies de monarques. Après les Empereurs en 1990 (Anton Schindling, Walter Ziegler [dir.], Die Kaiser der Neuzeit 1519-1918) et les rois de France en 1994 (voir BullMHFA, 30/31, 1995, p. 254), les dynasties territoriales, sur lesquelles la bibliographie est plus difficilement accessible, ont été mises à l’honneur : celle de Bavière en 2001 (voir BullMHFA, 38, 2002, p. 271-272), celle de Saxe (également roi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207