MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589045461 · doi:10.1109/ssci.2016.7849967

Ensemble of extreme learning machines for diagnosing bearing defects in non-stationary environments under class imbalance condition

2016· article· en· W2589045461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClass (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceEnsemble learningExtreme learning machineMachine learningBearing (navigation)State (computer science)Artificial neural networkAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two practical inevitabilities for diagnostic systems are the abilities of incremental learning in non-stationary environments and diagnosing under the class imbalance condition. The class imbalance condition has been widely occurred in real applications where system usually works in the normal state and it is not easy to collect the representative patterns of faulty classes. This work aims to adapt two state-of-the-art ensemble-based techniques for incremental learning and diagnosing faults in non-stationary environments under the class imbalance. These techniques train several extreme learning machines to create the ensemble which can incrementally learn the relation between features and faults in various class-imbalanced chunks of data collected from non-stationary environments. These diagnostic schemes are applied to diagnose bearing defects in induction motors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207