MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Independent and Converging Pathways in Leukemia Stem Cells.

2007· article· en· W2589081489 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Heuser, Bob Argiropoulos, Stephen Fung, Christy Brookes, R. Keith Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukemiaStem cellNPM1TransplantationBone marrowMyeloid leukemiaBiologyCancer researchImmunologyMinimal residual diseaseMyeloidMolecular biologyMedicineGeneInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Leukemias are considered hierarchically organized where a leukemia stem cell (LSC) maintains the disease, can reinitiate disease upon transplantation, and gives rise to more mature cells which can not establish the disease after secondary transplantation. While LSCs become the primary focus for targeted therapies, little is known about the pathways regulating LSC activity. Overexpression of HOX genes characterize the large group of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with NPM1 mutations whereas overexpression of MN1 is highly correlated with wildtype-NPM1 AML (Verhaak et al. 2005). We hypothesized that the LSCs in these two AML populations are differentially regulated as patients with NPM1 mutations tend to have better outcomes. To test this hypothesis we applied a transplantation model using murine bone marrow (BM) cells retrovirally transduced with MN1 or MN1+NUP98HOXD13 (ND13). Overexpression of ND13 in mouse BM leads to a “preleukemic” or MDS-like phenotype. In contrast, previously we found that overexpression of MN1 is alone sufficient to induce AML. MN1-induced leukemias were compared to MN1+ND13-induced leukemias. Mice transplanted with 1x10E6 BM cells overexpressing either MN1 or MN1+ND13 died after a median latency of 35 and 40 days, respectively (P=0.26). However, in limiting-dilution analysis of MN1 expressing cells the frequency of leukemia-stem cells (LSC) was 1 in 5465 and 1 in 3411 (two independent experiments, 0.024 percent of total cells), whereas it was 34-fold increased in MN1+ND13 coexpressing cells (0.82 percent of total cells, mean of two independent experiments; the 95 percent CIs do not overlap suggesting a significant difference). In addition, the disease latencies at limiting dilution differed significantly (MN1: 82 vs. MN1+ND13: 44 days, P=0.009), demonstrating that the addition of ND13 to MN1 enhanced the potency of the individual LSC besides its frequency. Addition of ND13 to MN1 changed the leukemic phenotype towards characteristics associated with ND13. To better understand non-redundant and redundant downstream pathways expression of several genes reportedly involved in stem-cell regulation and of HOXA and HOXB genes was quantified by qRT-PCR in MN1, ND13, or MN1+ND13 expressing cells and compared to their expression in normal BM cells. Increased expression of Bmi-1, mel18, HoxA11, and HoxB6 was observed in MN1 cells compared to normal BM. Increased expression in ND13 cells compared to normal BM were found for HoxA3, HoxA7, HoxB5, HoxB7, and HoxB8, whereas HoxA9, HoxA10, and Gata-2 showed increased expression compared to normal BM for both genes. Other important stem cell regulators like Notch1 (MN1, ND13) and HoxB4 (MN1) were expressed at lower levels than in normal BM. In summary, functional and gene expression data suggest activation of non-redundant (and redundant) pathways in MN1 compared to HOX-mediated leukemias. By modulating the LSC activity we show that addition of ND13 to MN1 has a pronounced effect on the frequency and activity of LSCs and that more aggressive LSCs are obtained by dysregulation of an additional/independent pathway. This suggests that elimination of LSCs in aggressive leukemias may require inhibition of multiple pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→