Asymmetric Oxidative Cycloetherification of Naphtholic Alcohols
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic, enantioselective oxidative cyclization of naphthol-derived carboxylic acids mediated by chiral hypervalent iodine reagents has been studied extensively in the recent past, but analogous reactions of non-carboxylic substrates are yet unknown. This paper describes a catalytic, enantioselective, hypervalent iodine-promoted oxidative cycloetherification reaction of naphtholic alcohols. The new process relies on a variant of the Uyanik-Ishihara catalyst, in which the stereogenic centers have been relocated closer to the iodine atom. The new catalyst design affords optical yields comparable to those available with Uyanik-Ishihara iodides, but chemical yields are sensibly higher, at least with the tests substrates. An even more problematic reaction is the catalytic, enantioselective oxidative cyclization of naphtholic sulfonamides. In this case, the new catalyst affords significantly higher optical inductions than Uyanik-Ishihara iodides. The kinetic resolution of particular naphtholic alcohols is demonstrated. The absolute configuration of a numver of enantioenriched compounds obtained in this study was ascertained by X-ray diffractometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it