Antibacterial <scp><i>N</i></scp>‐halamine coating on cotton fabric fabricated using mist polymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT 3‐Methylallyloxy‐5,5‐dimethylhydantoin (MH), an methacrylate monomer containing N‐halamine moiety, was synthesized by 5,5‐dimethylhydantoin (DMH) and methacryloyl chloride. Antimicrobial coating of poly[1‐methyl‐1‐(4,4‐dimethyl‐2,5‐dioxoimidazolidin‐carbonyl)ethylene] (PMH) was prepared on cotton fabrics via “mist polymerization” using MH as monomer. The coating gave the cotton fabric with efficient antibacterial function with remarkable durability. In the antibacterial tests, the bacteriostatic reduction rate is greater than 99.78%, and can be maintained over 99.00% even after 30 washing cycles. Compared with other antimicrobial technologies, mist polymerization offers advantages such as achieving antimicrobial function by small consumption of monomer, forming coatings on single‐side of the fabrics, and minimizing the damages on the original properties of cotton during the finishing process. It can be applied in a wide variety of textile products such as sportswear, underwear, socks, and medical textiles. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44897.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".