MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W258912578

关注痴呆患者姑息性护理的需求[英]/Burgess L//Nursing Times.

2005· article· no· W258912578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
于瑞英, Hong Kwek Kevin Jun

Bibliographic record

VenueNurs F Med Sci · 2005
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

痴呆是一种临床综合征,其典型症状为6个月或6个月以上的记忆或思维能力的下降,以及不同程度的日常生活能力的降低(WHO,1993年)。根据病变不同,痴呆可分为不同类型,其中以Alzheimer病最为常见,约占痴呆病例的50%,血管性痴呆约占20%(Sudbury,2000年)。其他还包括Huntington病、Pick病和Down综合征等。随着人口老龄化,痴呆发病率逐渐增高。而痴呆病变发展到中后期,患者对护理的依赖性逐渐加强,因而相应的专业护理亦显得十分必要。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNurs F Med SciSame topicMedical Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207