MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589208816 · doi:10.1107/s2056989017002791

Silver(I) nitrate complexes of three tetrakis-thioether-substituted pyrazine ligands: metal–organic chain, network and framework structures

2017· article· en· W2589208816 on OpenAlexaff
Tokouré Assoumatine, H. Stoeckli‐Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsCanAm Bioresearch (Canada)
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPyrazineChemistryDenticityLigand (biochemistry)Coordination sphereBridging ligandMetalSilver nitrateCrystallographyMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryInorganic chemistryCrystal structureOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of the ligand 2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(methylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine (L1) with silver(I) nitrate led to {[Ag(C12H20N2S4)](NO3)}n, (I),catena-poly[[silver(I)-μ-2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(methylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine] nitrate], a compound with a metal–organic chain structure. The asymmetric unit is composed of two half ligands, located about inversion centres, with one ligand coordinating to the silver atoms in a bis-tridentate manner and the other in a bis-bidentate manner. The charge on the metal atom is compensated for by a free nitrate anion. Hence, the silver atom has a fivefold S3N2coordination sphere. The reaction of the ligand 2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine (L2) with silver(I) nitrate, led to [Ag2(NO3)2(C32H28N2S4)]n, (II), poly[di-μ-nitrato-bis{μ-2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(phenylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine}disilver], a compound with a metal–organic network structure. The asymmetric unit is composed of half a ligand, located about an inversion centre, that coordinates to the silver atoms in a bis-tridentate manner. The nitrate anion coordinates to the silver atom in a bidentate/monodentate manner, bridging the silver atoms, which therefore have a sixfold S2NO3coordination sphere. The reaction of the ligand 2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(pyridin-2-ylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine (L3) with silver(I) nitrate led to [Ag3(NO3)3(C28H24N6S4)]n, (III), poly[trinitrato{μ6-2,3,5,6-tetrakis[(pyridin-2-ylsulfanyl)methyl]pyrazine}trisilver(I)], a compound with a metal–organic framework structure. The asymmetric unit is composed of half a ligand, located about an inversion centre, that coordinates to the silver atoms in a bis-tridentate manner. One pyridine N atom bridges the monomeric units, so forming a chain structure. Two nitrate O atoms also coordinate to this silver atom, hence it has a sixfold S2N2O2coordination sphere. The chains are linkedviaa second silver atom, located on a twofold rotation axis, coordinated by the second pyridine N atom. A second nitrate anion, also lying about the twofold rotation axis, coordinates to this silver atomviaan Ag—O bond, hence this second silver atom has a threefold N2O coordination sphere. In the crystal of (I), the nitrate anion plays an essential role in forming C—H...O hydrogen bonds that link the metal–organic chains to form a three-dimensional supramolecular structure. In the crystal of (II), the metal–organic networks (lying parallel to thebcplane) stack up thea-axis direction but there are no significant intermolecular interactions present between the layers. In the crystal of (III), there are a number of C—H...O hydrogen bonds present within the metal–organic framework. The role of the nitrate anion in the formation of the coordination polymers is also examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207