MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589292445

PNR agreement with Canada not cleared for takeoff

2016· article· en· W2589292445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fanny Coudert

Bibliographic record

VenueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCopyright and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearanceTakeoffAeronauticsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMedicineAerospace engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the 8th of September, AG Mengozzi issued his Opinion in the first case brought to the CJEU on the validity of an international agreement in light of the EU Charter. The European Parliament referred the text of the PNR Agreement with Canada before approving the proposal of the Council. This case also gives the Court the opportunity to further specify the criteria that should regulate the mass collection by law enforcement authorities of data captured by the private sector in their day-to-day business. The case is situated in the line of other cases brought before the CJEU (Digital Rights Ireland, Schrems) and the ECtHR (Zakharov and Szabó ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0160.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.003
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0220.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLirias (KU Leuven)Same topicCopyright and Intellectual PropertyFrench-language works237,207