Health Screening Camp-Unique Role of Clinical Pharmacist
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pharmacists have expanded their roles in practice settings and now serve as integral members of an interdisciplinary health care system. Screening and risk assessment services provided by pharmacist are common and routinely performed for a range of chronic disease conditions. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative disorder of multifactorial etiology requiring medical care and is an important antecedent to disability. The purpose of the camp was screening of Osteoarthritis patients with the objective of ‘Knee Help’. Osteoarthritis camp was organised by a team of orthopaedic surgeons which recruited patients of age group between 30yrs-70yrs, both male and female. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients presenting with joint pain and movement restriction whereas, patients who have undergone total knee replacement surgery were excluded respectively. Detailed history interview was conducted to access patients with osteoarthritis and WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index (Western Ontario and McMaster University) was used to access pain and physical function. A total of 105 patients were screened for Osteoarthritis out of which 55 patients were suspected of OA. From the suspected 55 patients, 31were male and 24were female. Most commonest etiologies observed were age factor and anaemic condition as OA being a chronic disease of multifactorial etiology. According to the WOMAC index, patients with mild to moderate assessment of disease were referred to as primary osteoarthritic patients. Age factor being common etiology for Osteoarthritis, contributes to the male dominance for the same. Pharmacist being an integral part of the health care system plays a major role in identification and screening of such chronic conditions to provide better patient care and also as early detection of these chronic conditions increases the opportunity for a number of interventions to be applied that may potentially decelerate the progression of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".