MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589555245 · doi:10.5430/wje.v7n1p53

We All Need WE: The Effect of Using Facebook and Group Fieldwork on Students’ Interdependence and Awareness of STSE Issues

2017· article· en· W2589555245 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Wafaa Mohammed Moawad Abd–El–Aal, Astrid Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyContext (archaeology)Social psychologyApplied psychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a departure from traditional lecture formats, this research examines the effect of using both Facebook and groupfieldwork in developing Egyptian pre-service teachers’ interdependence, and their awareness of STSE. Group workand fieldwork were found to enhance interdependence/cooperation of participants, as well as strengthen theirunderstanding of STSE issues. Participants found it difficult to find a balance between the different perspectivesafforded by STSE studies. A number of recommendations are offered to strengthen teacher preparation in anEgyptian context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of EducationSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207