Analytical and Numerical Analysis of the Shear Tension Critical Prestressed Beams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous structures constructed in 60’s and 70’s are now reaching their design service life and require reassessment to assure safety of users, reliability and economical exploitation. As a consequence, an adequate structural assessment of existing bridges has recently become a major subject of scientific work commissioned by the authorities in charge. The bridges designed according to then biding codes are often deemed to be structurally deficient when re-evaluated with more restricting current design provisions. At the same time, it is often in conflict with the reality as many of the structures still continue in operation displaying no perceptible deterioration of state nor fatigue. The challenge therefore is to develop more refined models to evaluate the structural behaviour and possible reserves of capacity accounting for the actual condition of the bridge under investigation. One of the potential deficiencies is related to the shear tension failure in thin-webbed post- tensioned T-girders which is the item of the this dissertation. The study comprises of two major parts. In the first part, the thesis investigates an ability of the shear provisions for reinforced concrete structures as given in the following codes: Canadian Standard Association (CSA), the fib Model Concrete 2010 (MC2010), the Eurocode 2 (EC2) and the RBK 1.1 (Richtlijnen Beoordeling Kunstwerken) to adequately address shear tension critical members. The predictions from codes are calculated for the three selected benchmark continuous I- beams tested in destructive laboratory tests as a part of the research on the influence of axial load and prestress on the shear strength of web-shear critical reinforced concrete elements at the University of Toronto. Out of three selected beams of interest subjected to approximately the same prestressing force, two contained a varying amount of reinforcement equal to twice and four times the minimum amount shear reinforcement as specified by the CSA code and one containing no stirrups in the test region. From the comparison of codes it was concluded that shear previsions relating shear resistance to the strain state of the considered section (CSA and MC2010) provide good predictions for members furnished with stirrups but inaccurately evaluate shear resistance for members without shear reinforcement being overly conservative. For this case, the empirical formulation according to the EC2 with mean characteristics applied resulted in the best estimate. In the second part of the study, an attempt to reproduce the tests of the benchmark beams numerically was undertaken. The simulation according to the highest level of approximation as classified in the MC2010 was performed through a series of nonlinear finite element analyses. Sensitivity analyses with the diverse variables such as: crack models, shear retention functions, iterative methods and convergence norms were studied to determine their influence on the ultimate shear strength and competence to recreate the observed in tests performance; i.e. the failure mechanism and crack pattern. From the conducted analyses, it was concluded that satisfactory crack pattern as well as magnitudes of shear resistance can be obtained for all treated specimens. The thesis was completed with considerations regarding the most appropriately performing constitutive model to simulate shear tension failure mechanism for the cases of benchmark tests. For the considered cases of shear tension critical beams, models with the rotating crack, energy convergence norm in combination with force or displacement convergence norm and the modified Newton-Raphson iterative method are recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it