MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589572904 · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.01.006

Complement Factor H Inhibits CD47-Mediated Resolution of Inflammation

2017· article· en· W2589572904 on OpenAlexaff
Bertrand Calippe, Sébastien Augustin, Fanny Béguier, Hugo Charles‐Messance, Lucie Poupel, Jean‐Baptiste Conart, Shulong J. Hu, Sophie Lavalette, Alexandre Fauvet, Julie Rayes, Olivier Levy, William Raoul, Catherine Fitting, Thomas Denèfle, Matthew C. Pickering, Claire L. Harris, Sylvie Jorieux, Patrick M. Sullivan, José‐Alain Sahel, Philippe Karoyan, Przemysław Sapieha, Xavier Guillonneau, Emmanuel L. Gautier, Florian Sennlaub

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunity · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsFactor HInflammationImmunologyComplement systemBiologyMacular degenerationDrusenIntegrin alpha MComplement factor BComplement factor IPathogenesisImmune systemMedicineRetina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunitySame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207