MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589600288 · doi:10.1177/1729881416682707

Polymer filament–based in situ microrobot fabrication using magnetic guidance

2016· article· en· W2589600288 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFabricationProtein filamentFused filament fabricationMicrofabricationMaterials scienceBendingPlanarGrippersMagnetNanotechnologyMicroscale chemistryMicrofluidicsSoft roboticsMechanical engineeringComputer science3D printingActuatorComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present a new three-dimensional printing inspired method for in situ fabrication of mobile magnetic microrobots with complex topology by bending a polymer filament on demand directly inside an enclosed operational environment. Compared with current microrobot fabrication methods that typically involve multiple microfabrication steps and complex equipment, the proposed method is simply and fast. The target shape is formed as the filament is fed through a hot needle inserted into the workspace, and the filament bending moment is induced by attaching a tip magnet at the end of the filament and projecting magnetic fields wirelessly from external electromagnetic coils. The filament bending mechanics and the behavior of the bending zone are analyzed and verified through bending experiment. A shape planner is developed for automatically controlling the fabrication process of any desired planar shapes, and the shape creation potential of this method is also studied. Magnetically active millimeter-scale robotic devices of different planar shapes are fabricated using polylactic acid filament with diameter as small as 100 μm. As demonstrations of the in situ formation of functional microrobotic devices, a micro-gripper is fabricated and controlled to assemble a cell cage. A micro-spring is created as a manipulating tool with force sensing capability. We, thus, show the utility of the fabrication method for creating complex microrobot shapes remotely in enclosed environments for advanced microrobotic applications, with the potential for scaled down applications in health care and microfluidics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it