MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Um samba nas quebradas do mundaréu : a história do samba paulistano na voz de Geraldo Filme, Zeca da Casa Verde, Toniquinho Batuqueiro e Plínio Marcos

2016· dissertation· pt· W2589605445 on OpenAlexaff
Lucas Tadeu Marchezin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian cultural history and politics
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStudioArtContext (archaeology)MusicalHumanitiesNarrativeCape verdeArt historyVisual artsSociologyHistoryLiteratureEthnologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present dissertation has as its object of study the album "Plínio Marcos em Prosa e samba, com Geraldo Filme, Zeca da Casa Verde e Toniquinho Batuqueiro", recorded in 1974 by the Chantecler studio.The research's goal is to understand the process through which those four artists have created a historical narrative about the samba in São Paulo.Accordingly, the research investigates the social context in which the artists met, worked together and recorded the album.To accomplish that, this study analyzes the album's structure and its constituting elements: the songs, the musical structure and narrative interventions made by Plínio Marcos.The combination of those components creates a discourse that aims at giving legitimacy to the idea of a samba paulista, featuring a distinctive history and different features from other regional samba traditions.The research finds a process of identity construction as present in the production of the record, a hybrid text about the samba paulista and the city of São Paulo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrazilian cultural history and politicsFrench-language works237,207