MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Treatment and outcomes of goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCAs) of the appendix.

2015· article· en· W2589605691 on OpenAlexaff
Erica S. Tsang, Yarrow J. McConnell, David J. Schaeffer, Lawrence Lee, Siham Zerhouni, Kimberly Schaff, Caroline Speers, Hagen F. Kennecke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineStage (stratigraphy)PopulationAppendixUnivariate analysisCancerLymph nodeAdenocarcinomaOxaliplatinGastroenterologySurgeryOncologyMultivariate analysisColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

551 Background: GCAs are rare mucinous neoplasms with mixed epithelial and endocrine differentiation, which behave more like mucinous adenocarcinomas than appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. Optimal therapy is poorly described. Objectives of this study were to define prognostic factors and describe management of patients presenting with stage I-IV disease. Methods: Patients diagnosed with GCAs between 1990-2010 were identified from the British Columbia province-wide cancer registry and linked to an electronic pathology archive. Pathology was reviewed in 79 of 87 cases where archival tissue was available. Treatment and outcome data were obtained from the BC Cancer Agency, GI Cancer Outcomes Unit, and Provincial Pharmacy databases, combined with chart review. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to compare outcomes. There were insufficient events for robust multivariate analysis. Results: 87 cases of appendiceal GCAs were identified for an annual population incidence of 0.2/200,000. Median age was 54 (range 25-91) years, and 42 (48%) were male. There were no stage I patients. For stage II-III (n=68) and stage IV (n=19) patients, median overall survival (OS) was 42.8 and 15.4 months, respectively (p=0.009). Of stage II-III patients, 51 (76%) underwent right hemicolectomy and 9 (16%) received adjuvant chemotherapy: 5-FU (n=5), 5FU/oxaliplatin (n=4). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 38.2 months (10 recurrences: 9 peritoneal, 1 hepatic). Univariate analysis demonstrated no prognostic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach (hemicolectomy vs. appendectomy), T4 tumors, number of nodes resected, or lymph node positivity. 5-year RFS was 90.2% in patients who presented with appendicitis, compared to 63.7% in those without appendicitis (p=0.016). Of 19 patients with stage IV disease, 10 (63%) received palliative chemotherapy including FOLFOX (n=4), FOLFIRI (n=1), FOLFIRI/bevacizumab (n=2), and capecitabine (n=2). Only high mitotic rate was associated with reduced OS. Conclusions: GCAs are rare tumors and the majority present with non-metastatic disease. Presentation with metastatic disease carries a poor prognosis and chemotherapy agents used for advanced colorectal tumors are most commonly applied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207