MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Integrated comprehensive high-throughput kinomics profiling and whole exome sequencing of penile squamous cell cancer (PSCC).

2014· article· en· W2589693254 on OpenAlexaff
Amitkumar Mehta, Christopher D. Willey, Michael Crowley, Joshua C. Anderson, Dongquan Chen, David K. Crossman, Andrea Necchi, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Bernhard J. Eigl, Richard J. Lee, Lauren C. Harshman, Tanya B. Dorff, Matt D. Galsky, Matthew I. Milowsky, Graeme B. Bolger, Mollie deShazo, Gurudatta Naik, William E. Grizzle, Guru Sonpavde

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinomeExome sequencingExomeCancer researchComputational biologyKinaseMedicineBiologyGeneticsGeneMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

383 Background: Molecular drivers in penile squamous cell cancer (PSCC), an orphan malignancy, remain unclear. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is not studying PSCC and the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) investigators have reported only targeted analyses of PSCC. We report the first integrated analyses of comprehensive kinomics and whole exome sequencing (seq) in tumors from patients (pts) with PSCC . Methods: We performed integrated functional kinomics profiling and comprehensive exome-seq of two frozen tissue samples from men with PSCC with a matched normal tissue procured from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network (CHTN). Kinomic profiling was performed using the PamStation 12 high-content phospho-peptide substrate microarray system (PamGene International). The protein tyrosine kinome and serine/threonine kinome PamChips were used to measure global kinase activity by detecting phosphorylation of various peptides through FITC-labeled antibodies. Upstream kinase prediction was performed using a scoring algorithm that incorporates the phosphonet database (www.phosphonet.ca). Exome capture was performed with the Agilent SureSelect v5 kit and whole exome-seq was done on the Illumina HiSeq2000 with paired end 100bp chemistry. Results: In the single patient, paired kinomics analysis comparing the tumor sample to adjacent normal tissue, the HER family (EGFR, ERBB2, 3 and 4), AXL, TYRO3 and SYK kinases were the most active. When combining the two tumors in an unpaired analysis against the normal sample, the HER (EGFR, ERBB2, 3 and 4), MER, FRK, and FAK, kinases showed increased activity. When comparing whole exome-seq of the two PSCC samples with normal, among the affected genes were CCDC181, ZNF717, MUC4, HGC6.3, NOTCH1, STK11, SIRPB1, SKA3, PDE6B, FAT1, CACNA2D1, USP17L11, MNT, and CEP89. We are evaluating 10 PSCC tumors and matched normal tissue by kinomics and whole exome-seq and will present these complete data and analysis at the conference. Conclusions: In our preliminary analysis of pts that underwent the first reported integrated kinomics and whole exome-seq performed in PSCC, we identified multiple potential therapeutic targets in tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→