MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589700506 · doi:10.1142/s0219876217500797

The Conservative Splitting High-Order Compact Finite Difference Scheme for Two-Dimensional Schrödinger Equations

2017· article· en· W2589700506 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Methods · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersChinese University of Hong KongUniversity of Hong KongNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsScheme (mathematics)Order (exchange)Energy (signal processing)Compact finite differenceCharge (physics)Schrödinger equationApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new conservative and splitting fourth-order compact difference scheme is proposed and analyzed for solving two-dimensional linear Schrödinger equations. The proposed splitting high-order compact scheme in two dimensions has the excellent property that it preserves the conservations of charge and energy. We strictly prove that the scheme satisfies the charge and energy conservations and it is unconditionally stable. We also prove the optimal error estimate of fourth-order accuracy in spatial step and second-order accuracy in time step. The scheme can be easily implemented and extended to higher dimensional problems. Numerical examples are presented to confirm our theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it