Delamination Studies in Drilling of GFRP Composites by using Taguchi Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials are one of the economically important alternatives to engineering materials due to their superior properties. Usually, drilling operation using twist drill is an important mechanical machining process for GFRP composite components. However, drilling operation is hard to carry out due to drilling-induced delamination. To increase drilling efficiency of GFRP composite laminates with the least waste and damages, it is essential to understand the drilling behavior by conducting a large number of drilling experiments and drilling parameters such as feed rate and spindle speed should be optimized. This paper presents delamination study of composite materials by conducting drilling experiments using Taguchi's L 25 , 5-level orthogonal array and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data obtained from the experiments and finally determine the optimal drilling parameters in drilling GFRP composite materials. Experiments were also conducted to determine whether varying feed&spindle speed during drilling could reduce the delamination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".