MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589789959

The People and the Policy: The Possibilities and Limitations of Current Supervisory Appraisal Practices for Experienced Secondary Teachers in Ontario

2016· dissertation· en· W2589789959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)PsychologyPublic relationsPedagogyEngineeringPolitical scienceMedical educationMedicineElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many Ontarians have lost faith in their teachers. In the court of public opinion, teachers are greedy, entitled, and highly fallible. Quality of teaching is questioned, and the belief that ineffective teachers are "protected" by their federations, persists. Raising the issue of teacher quality, and examining the Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) policy, at this time, has enormous implications. Are Ontarioâ s teachers held to the highest standards? Are there mechanisms and tools within the TPA policy that would promote authentic and sustained teacher development while at the same time offering provisions for the removal of those who do not demonstrate improvement? The purpose of this qualitative research study was to explore these questions and to examine perceptions of current supervisory appraisal practices of experienced secondary teachers in Ontario as held by teachers, administrators, and teacher labour union representatives. This study took a grounded theory approach and was propelled by a social constructivist interpretative framework. Three main sources of data were collected: document analysis, surveys, and interviews. All data were rigorously coded and analyzed, iteratively, in order to develop a comprehensive and rich narrative of the perceptions of the stakeholders in regards to the possibilities and limitations associated with current teacher evaluation practices in Ontario and the potential for authentic, lasting impact upon teaching practice. It is a central finding of this study that conflicting notions of teaching, and indeed in the expectations of the role teachers inhabit in education, create a tension within which clarity and consistency in implementation of the TPA process are casualties. Additional findings of this study are: (1) the TPA policy presupposes a particularly narrow view of teaching and teacher learning; (2) there are significant inconsistencies in implementation of the TPA process across the province; (3) problems in implementation are derived from the dueling objectives of the policy; and (4) for a large faction of study participants, the TPA process does not serve as a vehicle for teacher growth and development. Possibilities, however, within the current model of teacher performance appraisal in Ontario, are presented, as well as recommendations and directions for future inquiry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it