MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2589821476

Midwifery practice in Ontario, Canada

2016· other· en· W2589821476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerosityWitnessObstetricsNursingMedicinePolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last year I was fortunate to have the opportunity to spend six months in Ontario, Canada, hosted as a visiting academic at McMaster University. During my sabbatical, I was able to participate in the delivery of midwifery education, study the regulation of midwifery practice, and witness midwifery practice standards in action. These experiences were made possible by professional development funding provided by the University of the Sunshine Coast, the generosity of the host staff at McMaster University, and the primary care midwives working in Hamilton, Burlington, and Guelph. This article aims to share with readers what I learnt about midwifery practice in Canada and introduce readers to the funding of midwifery services and the regulation of midwifery practice in Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0750.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast)Same topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207