Retour réflexif sur un processus de construction d’indicateurs alternatifs dans l’agglomération grenobloise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face aux difficultés d'observation locales et prenant acte des apports et méfaits du chiffre dans les manières de gouverner, un collectif grenoblois composé d'acteurs de la politique de ville et d'universitaires, a mis en place une démarche de construction locale alternative d'Indicateurs de Bien-être Soutenable Territoriales (IBEST). Cherchant à analyser différemment leurs territoires d'intervention en se situant de manière explicite dans la lignée des travaux sur les nouveaux indicateurs de richesse, le projet vise la mise en place d'une démarche d'observation locale reproductible et au service de l'action publique. C'est à une analyse réflexive de la démarche sous-tendant le projet IBEST, à laquelle nous participons, que cet article est consacré.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".