Surface phonon polaritons as a source of laser cooling perturbation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of a solid-state sample placed in the vicinity of a laser cooled sample is theoretically investigated. The laser cooling process is based on anti-Stokes fluorescence. The laser cooled sample is a rare-earth doped low-phonon energy solid. In this system, all samples can support surface phonon polaritons (SPhPs) in the same or different wavelength regions. Two different cases are considered. In the first case a laser cooled ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet ( Yb<sup>3+</sup>:YAG ) sample is placed in a vacuum chamber near a YAG sample, which is at room temperature. In the second case a laser cooled Yb<sup>3+</sup>:YAG sample is placed near a silicon carbide (SiC) sample, which is at room temperature. It is shown that for short distances between samples, when there is coupling between SPhPs propagating in the sample undergoing laser cooling and SPhPs propagating in the next sample, the laser cooling process can deteriorate substantially. In the opposite case the SPhPs do not influence the laser cooling process significantly even if the distance between the samples is less than the dominant wavelength of thermal radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".