MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590027217 · doi:10.1364/josaa.34.000424

Theoretical analyses of a liquid crystal adaptive lens with optically hidden dielectric double layer

2017· article· en· W2590027217 on OpenAlexaff
Oleksandr Sova, Victor Reshetnyak, Tigran Galstian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America A · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'OptiqueUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricMaterials scienceLens (geology)Liquid crystalOpticsCrystal (programming language)Work (physics)Layer (electronics)Double layer (biology)OptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we theoretically analyze the performance trends of a liquid crystal lens based on the optically hidden dielectric double layer principle. We demonstrate possible ways to optimize the lens as a function of the material and geometric parameters used. The impact of relative dielectric constants, conductivities, and dimensions of the components of the hidden dielectric layer, as well as the thickness and the temperature of the liquid crystal material, are demonstrated. Corresponding trade-offs are briefly discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America ASame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207