Nasal and Nasoethmoidal-Orbital Fractures: A Continuum of Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unilateral nasoethmoid orbital (NOE) fracture is frequently misdiagnosed. This fracture is independent of the clinically obvious NOE fracture and has alternately been referred to as complex nasal, minimally displaced, occult or greenstick NOE fracture. Failure to identify and treat these injuries at initial presentation results in undesirable aesthetic and functional consequences that are difficult to repair secondarily. Three patients who presented with nasal fractures complicated by minimally displaced fractures of the medial orbital wall were reviewed retrospectively. These injuries were successfully diagnosed and treated after their examining physicians failed to appreciate the injury on the initial evaluation. Complex nasal injuries with fracture extensions to the NOE are often missed by the examining physician. These injuries should benefit from a high index of suspicion and be evaluated with axial and coronal computed tomographic imaging. Acute treatment with appropriate exposure, open reduction, internal fixation and bone grafting is most compatible with a successful outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".