MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590279016 · doi:10.11575/prism/30134

Strengthening Bilateral Relations Between Canada and the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq

2015· article· en· W2590279016 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Jihan Sharifi

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceEconomyRegional scienceGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Government of Canada has done an inadequate job of extending economic and diplomatic relations with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). While many Western nations, including our closest ally the United States, have extended relations with the Kurds, the Canadian government is lagging behind. " " The Kurdish Region in Northern Iraq has risen as a beacon of prosperity within an unstable region and volatile country. It is a pro-Western, democratic region with a growing economy. The Kurds have established diplomatic ties with a number of nations around the world. While Canada is beginning to extend ties with the KRG, including through the opening of a Canada Trade Office in the Kurdish capital Erbil, much more can be done to advance bilateral relations between the two governments."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicPost-Soviet Geopolitical DynamicsFrench-language works237,207